While actor Song Ha-yoon refuted the allegations that he committed school violence in high school, saying it was “groundless,” an informant who claimed that he had been subjected to school violence by Song Ha-yoon opened his mouth.
On JTBC’s current affairs and culture program “Incident Leader,” which aired on the 8th, an interview with the informant A, who was assaulted by Song Ha-yoon in high school, was released.
Mr. A claimed, “Song Ha-yoon separated me from two friends he was close to when he transferred, and the mass assault followed.” “Song Ha-yoon also hit me with his hands and feet,” he said, adding, “I suffered more than four weeks of injuries.”
Earlier, when allegations of school violence emerged, Song Ha-yoon said, “I only scolded the victim, who was my partner, to go to school, but I did not directly assault him.”
He also refuted Song Ha-yoon’s explanation that there was no forced transfer due to school violence. Mr. A said, “It is certain that Song Ha-yoon and other perpetrators were forced to transfer because of this.” All my classmates will know,” he stressed.
In addition, A said, “Song Ha-yoon said that I, the victim student, was his own partner, but there was no concept of a partner at the time because I sat in a row by arranging the desks in a row at the school.” “I didn’t disclose it because I didn’t want to get anything involved, but the more I heard about the alleged school violence, the more angry I got and reported it.”
The suspicion of Song Ha-yoon’s school violence was first raised through the “Incident Team Leader,” which aired on the 1st. The informant revealed that S, who was a high school senior in 2004, was called out without knowing the English language and was beaten for an hour and a half. Since then, suspicions have been raised that S is Song Ha-yoon.
In this regard, Song Ha-yoon’s agency, King Kong by Starship, said, “I would like to reiterate that neither the broadcast on JTBC’s ‘case leader’ nor the follow-up report on it is true,” adding, “We are considering all necessary measures such as confirming the facts of this case, civil and criminal measures for informants through legal review of the law firm, and provisional disposition to ban the broadcast of the case leader.”
